View Full Version : New Sig


Pixels
10-29-2004, 12:49 PM
http://img74.exs.cx/img74/2548/radiantsig.jpg

anyone wnat a tut on how to make it?

Nitrous
10-29-2004, 03:56 PM
Yea very nice... me like lol good work there.
Just delete the IMG code for ya other sig.

Pixels
10-29-2004, 09:27 PM
nar, i wnat both :P i dunno which to have.... :(

Nitrous
10-29-2004, 11:14 PM
The new one.... wow that was easy to decide lol

<~Darkshadow~>
10-30-2004, 12:34 AM
theyre both ***y, but i like the new one...it's pink! :D

Pixels
10-30-2004, 11:36 AM
theyre both ***y, but i like the new one...it's pink! :D


we now find out that omnicide is turned on by sigs :P

Nitrous
10-30-2004, 11:58 PM
Mate your really gunna have to remove that old sig soon.

Invader_gir
10-31-2004, 08:15 AM
it looks really cool, i like how the colors are and stuffs
the boarders cool too :cool:

<~Darkshadow~>
10-31-2004, 02:02 PM
we now find out that omnicide is turned on by sigs :P


damn......my secret has been revealed!!!!! NOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

lol.....anyhoo....i think u should stick with the new one and get rid of the old one before you get into trouble ;)

cHilli
10-31-2004, 02:41 PM
1ST:

Its all too hard and heavy, i think you need a tiny blur on the background, and the border shape is nice, but i dont like the effect.

2ND:

VERY nice I like al0t++
But why do you have Radiant on it?

Nitrous
10-31-2004, 05:24 PM
Because I think he still wants his name changed to Radiant.
^^ it's a better name than Pixels I think.

Pixels
10-31-2004, 10:17 PM
1ST:

Its all too hard and heavy, i think you need a tiny blur on the background, and the border shape is nice, but i dont like the effect.

2ND:

VERY nice I like al0t++
But why do you have Radiant on it?


sorry been at my dads so i haven't had time to change it.

In response to:
1)its heavy because the second layer is on hard light so it makes the effect that it is a heavier colour...

2) Thanks - And my new name is Radiant, as soon as admin can change it :P

cHilli
10-31-2004, 11:27 PM
@RE:1 - Yeah I know, but i think you should combine the layers, and add a tiny Gaussian Blur, like 0.x pixels..:)

Pixels
11-04-2004, 05:55 PM
BAH! Stuff you :P thanks for advice

cHilli
11-04-2004, 11:19 PM
thats for #1 ...

no2 is cool, maybe less holes in the border, and NOT repeating your name, rest is great:)

-Gold-
11-09-2004, 11:43 PM
I like it :D well done. i think he's right about the double name. and now it think that the border is kinda fuzzy, is that from the blur? just dosn't looke right to me...