View Full Version : would jak3 be better with a multiplyer system?


shadow dragon
03-11-2005, 04:31 AM
I think it really needed a multiplayer system because after u beat the game it gets kinda old and boring

Superbob
03-26-2005, 10:48 PM
Yeah, it does get boring after you beat the game. Jak 3 would be a totaly awesome game if it had a multiplayer mode in it, but it would take the creators a long time to create it if it was a really good multiplayer mode, like the multiplayer mode in Ratchet and Clank UYA.

cHilli
03-26-2005, 11:15 PM
Every game would be better with multiplayer

Alucard
05-02-2005, 12:16 AM
not every game, but it depends on what u mean by mulyplayer. like 2 people playing at once or taking turns. games like MGS, you're tryin to sneak around somewhere while some idiot is running around shooting everything that moves and blows your cover. and jak3 would be better with some kind of multyplayer system, but if you think about it who would the second player be? it couldn't be daxter cause he can't fight for crap. it couldn't be ashlen or the other crimson guards unless u only plan on giving cover fire, which would leave u behind. the only thing u could really do is have one person control jak, and have another person control dark jak or light jak at the same time, kind of like devil may cry 3 when u can control dante's shadow. but then that's antoher problem, trying to figure out how to alternate between regular, dark, and light jak and have it fair for both people. and it would make no sense just to have the second person with a control ready to swap total control over jak for a certain amount of time becasue then u might as well take turns on who's actually playing the game.

sweet
05-04-2005, 01:51 PM
i think jak 3 would be way better with multiplayer :)